Skip to content

Concepts and contexts · Health, development, relationships, learning

International Baccalaureate · IB Diploma · Psychology · SL · Topic 2

Video lesson for this topic Open the video page
9:22

Concepts and contexts

The World Health Organization estimates that about 280 million people live with depression. Is it a brain disease, a way of thinking, or a result of hard…

English narration · English + 中文 subtitles burned in

2.1

Concepts and contexts

IB Diploma Programme Psychology SL (the course first assessed in 2027). Topic 1 gave you the content: the three approaches and their studies. This topic adds the other two parts of the course. The six concepts 概念 are questions you ask of any study or claim. The four contexts 情境 are real-world areas where you use the content: health and well-being, human development, human relationships, and learning and cognition. SL and HL students study all four. Paper 1 tests this topic directly: Section B gives you an unseen situation from one context (two questions, 6 marks each), and Section C asks one concept-based essay (15 marks) from a choice of two, each from a different context.

The World Health Organization estimates that about 280 million people live with depression 抑郁症. Is it a brain disease, a way of thinking, or a result of hard lives? Each answer leads to a different treatment: pills, therapy, or changes to work and family life. The concepts help you judge such claims; the contexts give you the cases to judge.

Must-know for this topic:

Part Key content
concepts bias, causality, change, measurement, perspective, responsibility
health and well-being stress and the body; explaining and treating depression; diagnosis
human development theory of mind and how to measure it; attachment
human relationships helping (bystanders); obedience and conformity; prejudice and conflict
learning and cognition conditioning; social learning; testing and spacing; technology
Vocabulary Train
English
concepts/ˈkɒnsepts/
contexts/ˈkɒnteksts/
depression
2.2

The six concepts

Each concept is a question to ask. In an essay, you use them to evaluate, not just to describe.

Six coloured cards, one per concept: bias, causality, change, measurement, perspective and responsibility, each with its guiding question

The six concepts as six questions to ask of a study or a claim

Concept What it asks Example
bias 偏差 What could push a result one way? Asch tested only male American students.
causality 因果关系 Does X cause Y, or do they only occur together? Maguire's taxi drivers: a correlation.
change 变化 How and why does behaviour change? Draganski: the brain grew, then shrank.
measurement 测量 How was behaviour turned into data? Is it fair? Trust measured as money in a game.
perspective 视角 Which approach or group is speaking? Depression as genes, thoughts or poverty.
responsibility 责任 Who could be harmed? What do we owe them? Milgram's participants were very stressed.

Two related words appear in many questions. Validity 效度 means a study measures what it claims to measure. Reliability 信度 means it gives the same result when repeated.

Vocabulary Train
English
bias/ˈbaɪəs/
causality
change/tʃeɪndʒ/
measurement/ˈmeʒəmənt/
perspective/pəˈspektɪv/
responsibility/rɪˌspɒnsəˈbɪlɪti/
validity/væˈlɪdɪti/
reliability/rɪˌlaɪəˈbɪlɪti/
2.3

Context 1: health and well-being

Stress and health

Stress is not only a feeling; it changes the body. Kiecolt-Glaser et al. (1995) made a small wound on the arms of 13 women who cared for a relative with dementia and 13 similar women who did not. The carers' wounds took 48.7 days on average to heal, against 39.3 days. Long-term stress, through hormones such as cortisol, weakens the immune system 免疫系统.

Explaining depression

Each approach explains depression in its own way:

Approach Explanation Evidence
biological genes and serotonin twin heritability about 38% (Kendler, 2006); Caspi's 5-HTT study
cognitive negative thinking: Beck's cognitive triad 认知三联征 depressed people think badly of themselves, the world and the future
sociocultural hard life conditions and weak social support Brown and Harris (1978)

Brown and Harris (1978) interviewed working-class women in London. Women became depressed after a serious life event more often if they also had vulnerability factors 易感因素: no close person to talk to, three or more children under 14 at home, no job outside the home, or losing their mother before age 11.

The diathesis–stress model 素质-压力模型 joins these views. A diathesis is a weakness, such as certain genes or negative schemas. It does not cause depression by itself, but it lowers the amount of stress needed.

Graph of risk of depression against life stress: a high-vulnerability line crosses the threshold at moderate stress, a low-vulnerability line stays below it

Diathesis–stress: the same stress affects a vulnerable person more

Treatment and diagnosis

Treatments follow the explanations. Antidepressants such as SSRIs act on serotonin. Cognitive behavioural therapy 认知行为疗法 (CBT) teaches people to notice and test their negative thoughts. Social treatments improve support, for example through community groups. Many patients do best with a combination.

Diagnosis 诊断 uses manuals such as the DSM-5, which list symptoms. This is a measurement problem: in some cultures people describe depression mainly through body pain or tiredness, so a symptom list written in one culture can miss cases in another (bias).

Vocabulary Train
English
immune system/ɪˈmjuːn ˈsɪstəm/
cognitive triad
vulnerability factors
diathesis–stress model
cognitive behavioural therapy
diagnosis/ˌdaɪəɡˈnəʊsɪs/
2.4

Context 2: human development

Theory of mind

Theory of mind 心理理论 is understanding that other people have beliefs, wishes and knowledge that can differ from your own. Most children show it by about age 4 or 5.

Baron-Cohen, Leslie and Frith (1985) used the Sally–Anne task. Children watched two dolls act out the story below, then were asked where Sally would look for her marble. 85% of typical children (mean age about 4½) and 86% of children with Down syndrome said "the basket". Only 20% of autistic children did, although their mental age was higher. The researchers concluded that autism involves a specific difficulty with theory of mind.

Four panels: Sally puts a marble in the basket, Sally leaves, Anne moves it to the box, Sally returns and the child is asked where she will look

The Sally–Anne false-belief task

How should we measure theory of mind? This is a common Section C question, and it is a measurement question:

Strategy Strength Limit
verbal false-belief task (Sally–Anne) simple, standard, easy to compare needs language and memory, so it may underestimate young children
eye-gaze: where the child looks first (Clements and Perner, 1994) children look at the right place before they can say it looking is harder to interpret than an answer
looking time with infants (Onishi and Baillargeon, 2005) 15-month-olds looked longer when an actor searched in the "wrong" place we must infer surprise; other explanations are possible

The results suggest that the answer depends on the measure: the verbal task says age 4, but non-verbal measures suggest earlier understanding.

Attachment

Attachment 依恋 is the emotional bond between a child and a carer. Ainsworth's Strange Situation 陌生情境 observes a one-year-old as the mother leaves and returns, and classifies the child as secure, avoidant or resistant. In her American sample about two thirds were secure. A review of studies from eight countries (van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg, 1988) found more avoidant children in Germany and more resistant children in Japan. A Japanese baby rarely left alone may be very upset in the test for cultural reasons, not because of insecure attachment, so the measure may carry an American bias.

Vocabulary Train
English
theory of mind/ˈθɪəri ɒv maɪnd/
attachment/əˈtætʃmənt/
Strange Situation/streɪndʒ ˌsɪtʃuːˈeɪʃn/
2.5

Context 3: human relationships

Helping others

Darley and Latané (1968) let students talk over an intercom and heard another student have a seizure. When students believed they were the only listener, 85% went for help before the seizure ended; when they believed four others could hear, only 31% did. This is the bystander effect 旁观者效应: the more people present, the less each person feels responsible (diffusion of responsibility 责任分散).

Obedience and conformity

In Milgram's study (1963), 40 men were told to give a "learner" electric shocks for wrong answers. The shocks were not real, but the men believed they were. 65% continued to the highest level, 450 volts. Obedience fell when the learner was in the same room or when another "teacher" refused first. The study raises the concept of responsibility: many participants were in real distress, and today it would not pass an ethics review in this form.

Two columns comparing conformity (matching a group) and obedience (following an authority), with the conditions that raise or lower each

Conditions that raise or lower conformity and obedience

Prejudice and conflict

In Sherif's Robbers Cave study (1954), two groups of 11- and 12-year-old boys at a summer camp competed for prizes and soon became hostile. Simply meeting did not reduce the conflict. It fell when the groups had to work together on superordinate goals 共同目标, such as fixing the camp's water supply. Schools use the same idea in cooperative group work.

Vocabulary Train
English
bystander effect/ˈbaɪstændə ɪˈfekt/
diffusion of responsibility/dɪˈfjuːʒn ɒv rɪˌspɒnsəˈbɪlɪti/
superordinate goals/ˌsuːpəˈrɔːdɪnət ɡəʊlz/
2.6

Context 4: learning and cognition

Learning by conditioning and observation

In classical conditioning 经典条件反射, a neutral signal is paired with something that already causes a response, until the signal alone causes it (Pavlov's dogs learned to salivate at a sound). In operant conditioning 操作性条件反射, behaviour that is followed by a reward becomes more frequent (Skinner). Social learning theory (Topic 1) adds that we also learn by watching others.

Learning that lasts

Roediger and Karpicke (2006) had students learn short texts. One group read the text four times; another read it once and then tried to recall it three times. After one week, the "testing" group recalled 61% of the ideas and the "re-reading" group only 40%. This is the testing effect 测试效应. Spacing study over several days also helps more than one long session.

Technology and cognition

Sparrow et al. (2011) found that people remembered less of some new facts when they expected the computer to save them; they remembered instead where the facts were saved. This is often called the "Google effect".

Vocabulary Train
English
classical conditioning/ˈklæsɪkl kənˈdɪʃənɪŋ/
operant conditioning/ˈɒpərənt kənˈdɪʃənɪŋ/
testing effect/ˈtestɪŋ ɪˈfekt/
2.7

Answering Paper 1 Sections B and C

Section B (6 marks). You get a short new situation. Pick the right content, explain it, and use details from the situation. Do not just describe a study; show how it applies.

Section C (15 marks): plan. "One claim in health and well-being psychology is that one perspective is not enough to explain mental health. Discuss this claim with reference to one biological explanation of one or more disorders."

  1. Define the claim and the concept: perspective = the approach used.
  2. Biological explanation: genes, with Kendler (2006): about 38% of the risk comes from genes.
  3. So genes alone leave most of the variation unexplained.
  4. Caspi (2003): the gene mattered only with stressful life events, so biology and environment work together.
  5. A counter-point: SSRIs help many patients, so biology gives a useful treatment.
  6. Conclude: the evidence supports the claim; diathesis–stress joins the perspectives.
2.8

Checklist

  • The six concepts as questions; validity and reliability.
  • Health and well-being: stress and the immune system (Kiecolt-Glaser); three explanations of depression (Kendler, Caspi; Beck; Brown and Harris); diathesis–stress; treatments; culture and diagnosis.
  • Human development: theory of mind (Baron-Cohen et al.) and three ways to measure it; attachment and the Strange Situation across cultures.
  • Human relationships: the bystander effect (Darley and Latané); obedience (Milgram) and conformity; prejudice and superordinate goals (Sherif).
  • Learning and cognition: classical and operant conditioning; the testing effect (Roediger and Karpicke); the Google effect (Sparrow).
  • Section B: apply to the situation. Section C: use a concept to build an argument, with evidence on both sides and a conclusion.
Additional notes PDF
Supported preparation: Social learning without stereotypes

Scope and prerequisites

IB Psychology, the course first assessed in 2027. This supplement goes with Topic 2: the six concepts and the four contexts (health and well-being, human development, human relationships, learning and cognition), which all students study. There are no options in this course.

Mapped preparation outcomes: ib_psychology_sl.2.1, ib_psychology_sl.2.2. Read the matching native lesson first. Actual approved choices, evidence and final learner work remain separate.

Source vocabulary

social learning 社会学习; generalization 概括推广.

Explanation and worked method

A social-learning account identifies a model, observed action and consequences, then predicts learning or imitation under stated conditions. National or group identity is not a complete mechanism. Applying an approach to a context, such as learning and cognition, still needs evaluated studies.

Original classroom evidence panel for Social learning without stereotypes

Task: after observing a peer praised for a strategy, some pupils try it. Evaluate the explanation and a limit.

Observed modelling and praise make vicarious learning plausible. Prior preference, direct instruction or shared incentives could also matter. Compare opportunities and repeated behaviour rather than treating the whole group as identical.

Independent transfer

Design a comparison separating observation of strategy from observation of praise.

Attempt independently before reading the model.

Checked original model

Compare ethically approved conditions showing the same strategy with and without observed praise, keeping other exposure and instructions comparable and allocating appropriately. Measure subsequent strategy use. Prior preference and demand effects remain relevant; do not invent results.

These are authored formative expectations, not official IB descriptors. Accept other justified arguments with evidence and material limits.

Source and task holds

This supplement teaches the method for this part of the course. The full assessment criteria and any texts your school chooses come from your teacher.

Interactive lessons on this topic

Work through it step by step, with instant-check exercises.

Log in or create account

IGCSE, A-Level & AP