Writing Introductions and Conclusions
IntroducedShort, load-bearing, and then out of the way
- In a timed essay, every sentence spent on the introduction is a sentence not spent on evidence.
- Four of the six rubric points live in the body.
- So the introduction should do its job in two or three sentences and stop.
A timed introduction that starts with the history of everything leaves the body waiting outside.
A longer introduction generally improves a timed AP essay.
Difficulty 1/5 · 100 coins + a small bonus on first completion today
Four of the six points live in the body; sentences spent on the opening are taken from evidence.
A working introduction
- One sentence positioning the subject — enough context that the claim makes sense.
- One sentence stating a defensible thesis that responds to the prompt.
- Optionally one more, if the shape of your reasoning is genuinely load-bearing.
What to cut
- Cut the general opening — "Throughout history, humans have..." says nothing and costs a sentence.
- Cut the announcement of intent — "In this essay I will argue..." is a label, not an argument.
- Cut the definition of a word nobody disputes.
Write an opening and an ending that earn their place
Neither paragraph exists to be present — ask what a reader gains from it that they did not have.
"In this essay I will argue that..." is best described as...
Difficulty 1/5 · 100 coins + a small bonus on first completion today
It costs a sentence the body needed and takes no position of its own.
Select all the openings this lesson says to cut.
Difficulty 2/5 · 140 coins + a small bonus on first completion today
Positioning the subject is the one opening job worth a sentence.
"In this essay I will argue that..." earns nothing. It is a label announcing an argument rather than making one, and in a timed essay it costs a sentence that four of the six rubric points needed.
A strong conclusion restates the thesis in language you could not have used in the ____.
Difficulty 1/5 · 100 coins + a small bonus on first completion today
The language is earned by the argument the essay has just made.
The conclusion worth writing
- Restate the thesis in language you could not have used in the introduction, because the argument had not been made yet.
- Or say what follows from it — its significance, or the wider question it belongs to.
- Either is stronger than a summary, and neither takes more than two sentences.
Match each test to what it reveals.
Difficulty 2/5 · 140 coins + a small bonus on first completion today
Each test removes something and asks what was actually holding the essay together.
A test for both
- Delete your introduction and read from the first body paragraph. Is anything genuinely lost?
- Delete your conclusion and stop at the last body paragraph. Does it end or just stop?
- Whatever was genuinely lost is what those paragraphs should contain — and nothing else.
A conclusion that earns: "The policy is not failing to measure its success — it is succeeding at measuring the wrong thing, which is why more of it will not help." That sentence could not have opened the essay, because the argument had not yet been made.
Keep the introduction to two or three sentences: position the subject and state a defensible thesis. Cut general openings, announcements of intent and undisputed definitions. Make the conclusion restate the thesis in earned language or say what follows from it.
Write from an introduction of 3 sentences
- An introduction uses 3 sentences for the situation and the defensible thesis, and nothing else.
- A first draft had opened with 'since the dawn of time'.
- Say what to cut.
A draft introduction opens with 'since the dawn of time' and then takes a page to define a word nobody disputes. The revision uses 3 sentences, positions the subject and states a defensible thesis. What was right about the cut?
The opening should arrive at a claim a reader can oppose.
What is wrong with opening on 'since the dawn of time'?
Difficulty 1/5 · 100 coins + a small bonus on first completion today
A general opening is not yet an argument.