Historical sources and contextual evaluation · 历史来源与情境评估
| English | 中文 | Pinyin · 拼音 |
|---|---|---|
| provenance/ˈpruːvnəns/ | 来源背景 | lái yuán bèi jǐng |
| corroboration/kəˌrɒbəˈreɪʃn/ | 相互印证 | xiāng hù yìn zhèng |
A decision you can investigate
- A private letter and a public announcement describe the same event differently.
- Neither is automatically truthful or useless because of its genre.
一个你可以调查的决策
- 一封私人信件和一份公开声明以不同的方式描述了同一事件。
- 不能仅因其体裁就认定某一方必然真实或毫无价值。
Build the explanation
- A source's value depends on the inquiry question. Origin, purpose and content can explain what it reveals and what it cannot establish.
- Source comparison identifies a precise agreement or difference, then supports it with evidence from both.
构建解释
- 资料的价值取决于探究问题。来源背景、目的和内容可以说明它能揭示什么以及无法证实什么。
- 资料比较应明确具体的共同点或差异，并用两份资料的证据加以支持。
Match the terms to their precise meanings. · 将术语与其精确含义匹配。
Use these definitions in the particular context of Historical sources and contextual evaluation. · 在历史资料与语境评估的特定背景下使用这些定义。
Work through the evidence
- A contemporary announcement can show the official explanation offered to an audience. A private letter can show one person's response.
- Neither alone establishes the event's impact on everyone; compare with independent evidence and context.
梳理证据
- 当代公开声明可展示官方面向受众提供的解释；私人信件可反映个人的反应。
- 单凭任何一方都无法确立该事件对所有人的影响；需结合独立证据和背景进行对比。
What can an official announcement establish most directly? · 官方公告最直接能确立什么？
A contemporary announcement can show the official explanation offered to an audience. A private letter can show one person's response. Neither alone establishes the event's impact on everyone; compare with independent evidence and context. · 当代公开声明可展示官方面向受众提供的解释；私人信件可反映个人的反应。单凭任何一方都无法确立该事件对所有人的影响；需结合独立证据和背景进行对比。
Test the limits
- Do not write primary sources are reliable as a universal rule.
- Use the actual prescribed case studies, dates and actors selected by the school; this skills lesson is not case-study coverage.
测试极限
- 不要将“原始资料可靠”作为普遍规则来写。
- 使用学校实际指定的案例研究、日期和行动者；本技能课并非覆盖案例研究内容。
Which caution belongs to this particular task? · 哪项注意事项适用于此特定任务？
Do not write primary sources are reliable as a universal rule. Use the actual prescribed case studies, dates and actors selected by the school; this skills lesson is not case-study coverage. · 不要将“原始资料可靠”作为普遍规则来写。使用学校实际指定的案例研究、日期和行动者；本技能课并非覆盖案例研究内容。
The explanation in this lesson makes a conditional claim; relevant context and evidence still matter. · 本课的解释提出了条件性主张；相关背景和证据仍然重要。
Use the actual prescribed case studies, dates and actors selected by the school; this skills lesson is not case-study coverage. · 请使用学校实际选定的指定案例研究、日期及人物；本课仅为技能训练，不涉及具体案例内容的覆盖。
Apply and explain your answer
- What can an official announcement establish most directly?
- The public explanation offered by its issuing authority.
应用并解释你的答案
- 官方公告最直接能证明什么？
- 发布机构向公众提供的解释。
Choose the two statements supported by this lesson. · 选择本课支持的两项陈述。
The concept and worked evidence support these claims; the stated limits rule out the universal shortcut. · 概念和推演证据支持这些主张；明确的限制排除了普遍捷径。
Use the terms precisely
- provenance 来源背景: A source's origin and circumstances of production.
- corroboration 相互印证: Comparing independent evidence to test a claim.
精确使用术语
- 来源背景 来源背景：资料的产生地点及制作时的具体情况。
- 相互印证 相互印证：通过比对独立证据来检验一项主张。
A contemporary announcement can show the official explanation offered to an audience. A private letter can show one person's response. Neither alone establishes the event's impact on everyone; compare with independent evidence and context.
Do not write primary sources are reliable as a universal rule. Use the actual prescribed case studies, dates and actors selected by the school; this skills lesson is not case-study coverage.
A source's value depends on the inquiry question. Origin, purpose and content can explain what it reveals and what it cannot establish.
当代公开声明可展示官方面向受众提供的解释；私人信件可反映个人的反应。单凭任何一方都无法确立该事件对所有人的影响；需结合独立证据和背景进行对比。
不要将“原始资料可靠”作为普遍规则来写。使用学校实际指定的案例研究、日期和行动者；本技能课并非覆盖案例研究内容。
资料来源的价值取决于探究问题。来源、目的和内容可以说明它揭示了什么，以及无法确立什么。