Water movement: compare potential and net change
| English | 中文 | Pinyin · 拼音 |
|---|---|---|
| water potential/ˈwɔːtə pəˈtenʃl/ | 水势 | shuǐ shì |
| turgor/ˈtɜːɡə/ | 膨压 | péng yā |
What would explain this observation?
- Plant tissue can gain or lose mass in different solutions. The direction of net water movement depends on the water-potential 水势 difference, not on whether water molecules move at all.
- Start with a prediction. State the quantities or features you would compare, then decide what evidence could distinguish two explanations.
Build the model
- Water moves through a water-permeable membrane from higher toward lower water potential. Dissolved solute lowers the tendency of water to leave a solution relative to the chosen reference. A plant cell wall allows pressure to develop as water enters; tissue behaviour cannot always be explained by solute concentration alone.
- water potential: A measure used to compare the tendency of water to move between systems; turgor 膨压: Pressure of plant-cell contents against the cell wall.
What does a zero percentage mass change support in this experiment?
A zero mass change suggests no net transfer over the measured interval under the experimental conditions. It does not imply that every individual cell has the same potential or that molecular exchange stops. Compare percentage change when initial sample masses differ.
Match each technical term to its precise meaning.
Use the definitions to distinguish related quantities and processes.
Choose evidence that can test it
- A zero mass change suggests no net transfer over the measured interval under the experimental conditions. It does not imply that every individual cell has the same potential or that molecular exchange stops. Compare percentage change when initial sample masses differ.
- Use repeated equal-sized plant samples in teacher-approved solutions. Keep tissue source, temperature, volume and time consistent; blot consistently before weighing. Record initial/final mass and plot percentage change against solution concentration, retaining variation and the uncertainty of any interpolated zero-change point.
Which two habits make the investigation or model in this case more defensible?
Use repeated equal-sized plant samples in teacher-approved solutions. Keep tissue source, temperature, volume and time consistent; blot consistently before weighing. Record initial/final mass and plot percentage change against solution concentration, retaining variation and the uncertainty of any interpolated zero-change point.
Work from known quantities
- State the known values and their units. Choose the relation because its assumptions fit this case, then rearrange before substitution.
- Known: a 5.00 g tissue sample becomes 5.40 g. Percentage mass change = (5.40−5.00)/5.00×100 = +8%. This supports net water entry under the measured conditions. A separate sample with zero change is consistent with balanced net transfer, but this mass method does not independently measure cell pressure.
A tissue sample changes from 4.00 g to 4.20 g. Calculate percentage mass change. Use the same sequence: known quantities → model → relation → substitution → unit and interpretation.
A tissue sample changes from 4.00 g to 4.20 g. Calculate percentage mass change.
The result is 5 %. Known: a 5.00 g tissue sample becomes 5.40 g. Percentage mass change = (5.40−5.00)/5.00×100 = +8%. This supports net water entry under the measured conditions. A separate sample with zero change is consistent with balanced net transfer, but this mass method does not independently measure cell pressure.
Check the conclusion and its limits
- This SL preparation focus uses qualitative water-potential reasoning and mass-change evidence. Quantitative solute/pressure equations are kept in the separate HL preparation case pending exact guide review. Blotting variation or tissue damage can change the observed result.
- Return to the original observation. Explain what the result supports, which conditions it assumes, and one way to test a competing explanation.
A zero net mass change proves that all movement of water molecules has stopped. This claim is false: This SL preparation focus uses qualitative water-potential reasoning and mass-change evidence. Quantitative solute/pressure equations are kept in the separate HL preparation case pending exact guide review. Blotting variation or tissue damage can change the observed result.
Water movement: compare potential and net change: A zero mass change suggests no net transfer over the measured interval under the experimental conditions. It does not imply that every individual cell has the same potential or that molecular exchange stops. Compare percentage change when initial sample masses differ.
A zero net mass change proves that all movement of water molecules has stopped.
This SL preparation focus uses qualitative water-potential reasoning and mass-change evidence. Quantitative solute/pressure equations are kept in the separate HL preparation case pending exact guide review. Blotting variation or tissue damage can change the observed result.
A measure used to compare the tendency of water to move between systems: write the technical term.
water potential means A measure used to compare the tendency of water to move between systems.