Understanding the Scoring Guidelines · 理解评分标准
| English | 中文 | Pinyin · 拼音 |
|---|---|---|
| scoring guidelines/ˈskɔːrɪŋ ˈɡaɪdlaɪnz/ | 评分标准 | píng fēn biāo zhǔn |
Know how you are judged
- Both sections are scored against published scoring guidelines 评分标准.
- Knowing them helps you build a stronger portfolio.
- The guidelines describe levels from weak to excellent.
了解你如何被评判
- 两个部分都根据公布的评分标准(scoring guidelines)评分。
- 了解它们帮助你建立更强的作品集。
- 标准描述从弱到优秀的各个等级。
What each section rewards
- The Sustained Investigation is scored on inquiry and on practice, experimentation, and revision.
- Selected Works are scored on 2-D skills and the synthesis of materials, processes, and ideas.
- Readers use visual evidence in the work plus your writing.
每个部分奖励什么
- 持续探究根据探究以及实践、实验和修改评分。
- 精选作品根据二维技能和材料、过程、想法的综合评分。
- 评卷者使用作品中的视觉证据加上你的写作。
Which section's criterion? · 哪项标准的准则？
Sort each criterion by the section it applies to. · 按适用部分对每个标准进行排序。
The Selected Works section is scored mainly on 2-D skills and... · 精选作品部分主要根据 2-D 技能进行评分，以及...
Selected Works are scored on 2-D skills and synthesis. · 精选作品根据 2-D 技能和综合应用进行评分。
Both portfolio sections are scored against published ____ guidelines. · Portfolio 两部分均根据已发布的____标准评分。
The scoring guidelines describe levels from weak to excellent. · 评分标准描述了从弱到优的等级。
Select all · 所有 things readers use to score the portfolio. · 选择读者用于评估 Portfolio 的所有要素。
Visual evidence, writing, and the guidelines are used; fame is not. · 使用视觉证据、写作和标准；不使用知名度。
Match each section to its criteria. · 将每个部分与其标准匹配。
SI = inquiry; Selected Works = skills; guidelines = the standard. · SI = 探究；精选作品 = 技能；标准 = 准则。
Design with the criteria in mind
- Design your work with the criteria in mind — not to a formula.
- The top levels show clear, sustained, well-integrated evidence.
- Understanding the guidelines is a tool, not a checklist to fake.
带着标准来设计
- 带着标准来设计你的作品——而非套用公式。
- 最高等级展示清晰、持续、良好整合的证据。
- 理解标准是一种工具,而非用来假装的清单。
You should design your work to genuinely meet the criteria, not fake evidence. · 你应设计作品以真正符合标准，而非伪造证据。
Use the scoring guidelines to guide honest work. · 使用评分标准来指导诚实的创作。
Know the scoring guidelines, but do not paint to a formula. The guidelines reward genuine inquiry, experimentation, revision, skill, and synthesis — not boxes ticked mechanically. Use them to guide honest work, not to fake evidence of a process you did not actually do.
了解评分标准,但不要套用公式作画。标准奖励真诚的探究、实验、修改、技能和综合——而非机械勾选的方框。用它们来引导诚实的工作,而非假造你实际上没有做过的过程的证据。
A student reads the scoring guidelines and realises her Sustained Investigation shows finished works but little experimentation. So she genuinely goes back, tries new processes, and documents them. She is not faking — she is using the criteria to strengthen real work.
一位学生阅读评分标准,意识到她的持续探究展示了成品但很少实验。于是她真的回去,尝试新过程,并记录它们。她不是在造假——她是在用标准来加强真实的工作。
Both sections are scored against the scoring guidelines: the Sustained Investigation on inquiry and practice/experimentation/revision; Selected Works on 2-D skills and synthesis. Readers use visual evidence plus your writing. Design with the criteria in mind — to guide honest work, not to fake it.
两个部分都根据评分标准评分:持续探究根据探究和实践/实验/修改;精选作品根据二维技能和综合。评卷者使用视觉证据加上你的写作。带着标准来设计——引导诚实的工作,而非造假。