Writing About Your Work · 关于你的作品写作
| English | 中文 | Pinyin · 拼音 |
|---|---|---|
| character limits/ˈkærɪktə ˈlɪmɪts/ | 字数限制 | zì shù xiàn zhì |
Words the viewer needs
- Writing communicates your inquiry, processes, and ideas to viewers who cannot ask you questions.
- The reader sees only your images and your words.
- Clear writing makes your intention understood.
观者需要的文字
- 写作向无法向你提问的观者传达你的探究、过程和想法。
- 评卷者只看到你的图像和你的文字。
- 清晰的写作使你的意图被理解。
Within the limit
- Written evidence must fit within the College Board character limits 字数限制.
- Be concise and specific — every word must earn its place.
- State the guiding question(s) of the sustained investigation clearly.
在限制之内
- 书面材料必须符合大学理事会的字数限制(character limits)。
- 简洁而具体——每个字都必须发挥作用。
- 清楚地陈述持续探究的引导性问题。
Strong or weak portfolio writing? · 强效还是弱效的 Portfolio 写作？
Sort each statement as strong (specific) or weak (vague) writing. · 将每项陈述归类为强效（具体）或弱效（模糊）写作。
Portfolio writing must fit within the College Board... · Portfolio 写作必须符合 College Board...
Written evidence must fit the character limits. · 书面证据必须在字符限制内。
The writing should clearly state the ____ question of the sustained investigation. · 写作应清楚阐明持续性研究的____问题。
State the guiding question clearly and concisely. · 清晰且简洁地陈述引导性问题。
Select all · 所有 features of strong portfolio writing. · 选择所有强效 Portfolio 写作的特征。
Concise, specific, evidence-based writing is strong; flowery length is not. · 简洁、具体且有证据支持的写作是强效的；华丽的篇幅不是。
Match each phrase to strong or weak. · 将每个短语归类为强效或弱效。
Specific + question = strong; vague = weak. · 具体 + 问题 = 强效；模糊 = 弱效。
Show, do not claim
- Describe how the work shows practice, experimentation, and revision — with evidence.
- Point to what is actually visible, not vague claims.
- Write plainly; the reader should understand from words plus images.
展示,而非声称
- 用证据描述作品如何展示实践、实验和修改。
- 指向实际可见的东西,而非模糊的声称。
- 写得朴实;评卷者应从文字加图像理解。
Good portfolio writing points to specific, visible evidence rather than vague claims. · 优秀的 Portfolio 写作指向具体的、可见的证据，而非模糊的声明。
Concrete, specific writing beats flowery, empty prose. · 具体实在的写作优于华丽空洞的文辞。
Writing has a strict character limit, so do not waste words on vague statements like "I explored my creativity". State the guiding question and point to specific evidence in the images. Concrete, specific writing tied to what is visible beats flowery, empty prose every time.
写作有严格的字数限制,所以不要在“我探索了我的创造力”这样模糊的陈述上浪费字数。陈述引导性问题并指向图像中的具体证据。具体、与可见内容相连的写作每次都胜过华丽、空洞的散文。
Weak: "This piece shows my journey and emotions." Strong (within the character limit): "My question was how texture conveys grief. Here I tore and re-layered paper (image 4), then reworked it in ink (image 5) after a critique." The strong version points to specific, visible evidence.
弱:“这件作品展示我的旅程和情感。”强(在字数限制内):“我的问题是肌理如何传达悲伤。这里我撕开并重新层叠纸(图 4),然后在评图后用墨水重做(图 5)。”强的版本指向具体、可见的证据。
Writing communicates your inquiry, processes, and ideas within strict character limits. State the guiding question(s) clearly and describe how the work shows practice, experimentation, and revision, pointing to specific visible evidence. Be concise and concrete, not vague.
写作在严格的字数限制内传达你的探究、过程和想法。清楚陈述引导性问题,并描述作品如何展示实践、实验和修改,指向具体可见的证据。要简洁、具体,而非模糊。