1 · English non-literary analysis · 英语非文学分析
register · visual hierarchy
U1-Q1 · 2 marks
What is the best analysis of the countdown? · 对倒计时的最佳分析是什么？
Answer and reasoning · 答案与解析
It makes the time limit prominent and supports the advert's pressure to act quickly. · 它使时间限制变得醒目，并支持广告促使读者迅速行动的紧迫感。
U1-Q2 · 4 marks
Explain the mechanism or reasoning in this original case: An advert says only three days left beside a large countdown. Words and layout cooperate to create urgency rather than simply deliver information. · 解释原始案例中的机制或推理：广告在大型倒计时旁仅写“仅剩三天”。文字与排版协同营造紧迫感，而不仅仅是传递信息。
Answer and reasoning · 答案与解析
Only three days left combines a restrictive word with a time limit; the large countdown makes urgency visible. Explain how this could prompt quick action, while acknowledging that different readers may resist the message. · “仅剩三天”结合了限制性词语与时间限制；大型倒计时使紧迫感变得直观可见。解释这如何能促使迅速行动，同时承认不同读者可能会对该信息产生抵触。
- Accurate relevant concept (1)
- Specific evidence from the case (1)
- Connected reasoning (2)
Do not list techniques without their function or assume an effect occurs for every reader. / HL analyses both unseen texts in Paper 1; SL chooses one. Practise complete analysis rather than doubling an SL answer. · 不要在不说明功能的情况下罗列技巧，也不要假设每种效果都会在所有读者身上发生。/ HL 分析 Paper 1 中的两篇非阅读文本；SL 仅选一篇。应练习完整的分析，而非简单将 SL 的答案加倍。
2 · Literary comparison and context · 文学比较与背景
intertextuality · narrative voice
U2-Q1 · 2 marks
What is suitable evidence for Paper 2? · Paper 2适合的证据是什么？
Answer and reasoning · 答案与解析
Specific authorial choices from two studied literary works linked to the question. · 两部指定文学作品中与问题相关的具体作者选择。
U2-Q2 · 4 marks
Explain the mechanism or reasoning in this original case: Two works can explore exclusion through different voices and structures. A comparison must explain these choices, not merely identify a shared theme. · 解释原始案例中的机制或推理：两部作品可通过不同的声音和结构探讨排斥主题。比较必须解释这些选择，而不仅仅是识别共同主题。
Answer and reasoning · 答案与解析
One narrator may withhold a character's motives while another presents interior thought. Compare how these choices position readers to judge exclusion. Select precise evidence from the school's texts and connect it to your thesis. · 一位叙述者可能隐藏人物的动机，而另一位则呈现内心思想。比较这些选择如何引导读者评判排斥现象。从学校指定的文本中选取精确的证据，并将其与你的论点联系起来。
- Accurate relevant concept (1)
- Specific evidence from the case (1)
- Connected reasoning (2)
Do not compare one literary and one non-literary text for Paper 2. / Context informs an interpretation but cannot replace close reading or prove a single fixed meaning. · 不要在 Paper 2 中将一部文学作品与非文学作品进行比较。/ 背景有助于阐释但无法替代细读，也不能证明存在唯一固定的含义。
3 · A global issue across literary and non-literary work · 贯穿文学作品与非文学作品的全球性议题
global issue · authorial choice
U3-Q1 · 2 marks
Which pairing belongs to this course's oral? · 哪组配对适用于本课程的口头报告？
Answer and reasoning · 答案与解析
One literary work and one non-literary body of work exploring the same global issue. · 一部文学作品与一部非文学作品共同探索同一全球议题。
U3-Q2 · 4 marks
Explain the mechanism or reasoning in this original case: Access to education is broad; how language labels outsiders in institutions is more focused. An oral needs a debatable issue visible in both selected works. · 解释原始案例中的机制或推理：“受教育权”涵盖面较广，而“语言如何在机构中标记局外人”则更为聚焦。口语考试需要选择一个在两部选定作品中均可体现的有争议议题。
Answer and reasoning · 答案与解析
Select an extract where labels shape a character's treatment and a related text from an approved non-literary body of work. Compare how diction and framing operate, then show where the pattern continues or changes across each work. · 选取一个标签塑造人物处境的选段，以及来自经批准的非文学文本库的相关文本。比较措辞和框架如何运作，然后展示该模式在每个文本中是延续还是改变。
- Accurate relevant concept (1)
- Specific evidence from the case (1)
- Connected reasoning (2)
The oral is supervised spoken assessment, not an essay submitted in its place. / Teacher verifies text eligibility, extract limits, notes and scheduling against the guide. · 口语考试是受监督的口头测试，并非以提交论文的形式替代。/ 教师依据指南核实文本资格、摘录限制、笔记及时间安排。