Skip to content · ⁨Lompat ke konten⁩

GAC013 Science II: Scientific Principles · ⁨GAC013 Sains II: Prinsip Sains⁩

GAC Science · ⁨GAC Sains⁩ · Topic 1 · ⁨Topik 1⁩

1.1

What this module is, and how it is marked · ⁨Apa modul ini, dan bagaimana ia dinilai⁩

English

Two paper samples retain different amounts of water. Does that mean one is best for every cleaning task? To answer well, a scientist asks how the comparison was made, which properties were tested and what remains unknown.

This guide supports GAC013: the development of scientific ideas, investigation, scientific language, the organisation of research and scientific issues. Science includes evidence, methods, explanations and a growing body of knowledge. Its questions connect physics, chemistry, biology and other fields.

A practical investigation 探究实验 needs a safe, permitted method that fits its question. An investigation report 实验报告 records that method, the actual observations and a conclusion limited by the evidence. Follow your teacher's current brief for assessment criteria, structure and deadlines. The original companion sheets are practice, not official assessment papers. No result or phrase guarantees a mark. Never replace an unexpected observation with a predicted answer.

Bahasa Indonesia

Dua sampel kertas menahan jumlah air yang berbeda. Apakah itu berarti yang terbaik untuk setiap tugas pembersihan? Untuk menjawab dengan baik, seorang ilmuwan bertanya bagaimana perbandingan dilakukan, sifat apa saja yang diuji, dan apa yang belum diketahui.

Panduan ini mendukung GAC013: pengembangan ide ilmiah, penyelidikan, bahasa ilmiah, organisasi penelitian, dan isu-isu ilmiah. Sains mencakup bukti, metode, penjelasan, dan kumpulan pengetahuan yang terus berkembang. Pertanyaannya menghubungkan fisika, kimia, biologi, dan bidang lainnya.

Sebuah penyelidikan praktik memerlukan metode yang aman dan diizinkan yang sesuai dengan pertanyaannya. Laporan penyelidikan mencatat metode tersebut, observasi aktual, dan kesimpulan yang dibatasi oleh bukti. Ikuti brief guru Anda saat ini mengenai kriteria penilaian, struktur, dan tenggat waktu. Lembar pendamping asli hanyalah latihan, bukan soal penilaian resmi. Tidak ada hasil atau frasa yang menjamin nilai. Jangan pernah mengganti observasi tak terduga dengan jawaban yang diprediksi.

1.1

The history of science · ⁨Sejarah sains⁩

Syllabus · ⁨Silabus⁩
English

Unit 1 of 5 in GAC013 Science II: Scientific Principles (Level II). The module is taught over about 40 class hours plus 20 hours of independent study, and is assessed at the teaching centre and moderated by ACT — there is no external exam.

Module purpose: On completion of this module, students should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the basic laws, theories and principles of contemporary science.

The module outcomes this unit works towards:

Learning Objective GAC013.1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the historical development of scientific ideas, and apply that knowledge to differentiate between the different areas of science.

Bahasa Indonesia

Unit 1 dari 5 dalam GAC013 Sains II: Prinsip Sains (Tingkat II). Modul ini diajarkan selama sekitar 40 jam pelajaran ditambah 20 jam belajar mandiri, dan dinilai di pusat pengajaran serta dimoderasi oleh ACT — tidak ada ujian eksternal.

Tujuan modul: Setelah menyelesaikan modul ini, siswa seharusnya mampu menunjukkan pengetahuan dan pemahaman tentang hukum, teori, dan prinsip sains kontemporer yang mendasar.

Hasil pembelajaran yang dicapai unit ini:

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.1: Menunjukkan pengetahuan dan pemahaman tentang perkembangan historis ide-ide ilmiah, dan menerapkan pengetahuan tersebut untuk membedakan antara bidang-bidang sains yang berbeda.

Source: Cambridge International syllabus · ⁨Sumber: Silabus Cambridge International⁩

English

A paradigm 范式 is a broad framework shaping explanations and questions. A paradigm shift 范式转换 is a substantial change in that framework. Not every revised number or new observation is a shift of this scale.

Scientific explanations are provisional 暂定的: they remain open to evidence-led revision. This does not mean that every explanation is equally uncertain. A model represents selected features of a system; observations test how well its predictions and explanations work within a stated scope.

Worked example: separate event dates from award dates

Thomson identified the electron in 1897. Rutherford's 1911 atomic-structure analysis drew on scattering measurements, including work by Geiger and Marsden. Chadwick established evidence for the neutron in 1932. These are selected developments, not a complete history of science. A scientist's award year is not automatically the discovery or publication year.

Sources checked 2 October 2026: Nobel atomic-history timeline, electron discovery, and Chadwick facts.

Physics studies matter and energy. Chemistry studies substances and their changes. Biology studies living systems. A plant-growth investigation can be biological while using physical measurements of light and chemical ideas about materials. Naming its main field does not supply its result.

Bahasa Indonesia

Sebuah paradigma adalah kerangka kerja luas yang membentuk penjelasan dan pertanyaan. Pergeseran paradigma adalah perubahan substansial dalam kerangka kerja tersebut. Tidak setiap angka yang direvisi atau observasi baru merupakan pergeseran sebesarnya itu.

Penjelasan ilmiah bersifat sementara: mereka tetap terbuka untuk revisi yang dipimpin oleh bukti. Ini tidak berarti setiap penjelasan sama-sama tidak pasti. Sebuah model mewakili fitur terpilih dari suatu sistem; observasi menguji seberapa baik prediksi dan penjelasannya bekerja dalam ruang lingkup yang ditetapkan.

Bukti terpilih tentang elektron, struktur atom, dan neutron berkontribusi pada perubahan ide tentang atom.

Contoh terpecahkan: pisahkan tanggal peristiwa dari tanggal penghargaan

Thomson mengidentifikasi elektron pada tahun 1897. Analisis struktur atom Rutherford pada tahun 1911 memanfaatkan pengukuran hamburan, termasuk karya Geiger dan Marsden. Chadwick menetapkan bukti untuk neutron pada tahun 1932. Ini adalah perkembangan yang dipilih, bukan sejarah sains yang lengkap. Tahun penghargaan seorang ilmuwan tidak otomatis merupakan tahun penemuan atau publikasi.

Sumber dicek pada 2 Oktober 2026: Garis waktu sejarah atom Nobel, penemuan elektron, dan fakta Chadwick.

Fisika mempelajari materi dan energi. Kimia mempelajari zat dan perubahannya. Biologi mempelajari sistem hidup. Penyelidikan pertumbuhan tanaman bisa bersifat biologis sambil menggunakan pengukuran fisik cahaya dan ide-ide kimia tentang material. Menentukan bidang utamanya tidak memberikan hasilnya.

Vocabulary · ⁨Kosa kata⁩ Train · ⁨Latih⁩
English Bahasa Indonesia
practical investigation/ˈpræktɪkl ɪnˌvestɪˈɡeɪʃn/ Investigasi praktis
investigation report/ɪnˌvestɪˈɡeɪʃn rɪˈpɔːt/ Laporan investigasi
paradigm/ˈpærədaɪm/ paradigma
paradigm shift/ˈpærədaɪm ʃɪft/ pergeseran paradigma
provisional/prəˈvɪʒənl/ sementara
hypothesis/haɪˈpɒθəsɪs/ hipotesis
independent variable/ˌɪndɪˈpendənt ˈveərɪəbl/ variabel independen
dependent variable/dɪˈpendənt ˈveərɪəbl/ variabel dependen
control variables/kənˈtrəʊl ˈveərɪəblz/ variabel kontrol
control group/kənˈtrəʊl ɡruːp/ kelompok kontrol
Repeat/rɪˈpiːt/ Ulangi
1.2

The scientific method · ⁨Metode ilmiah⁩

Syllabus · ⁨Silabus⁩
English

Unit 2 of 5 in GAC013 Science II: Scientific Principles (Level II). The module is taught over about 40 class hours plus 20 hours of independent study, and is assessed at the teaching centre and moderated by ACT — there is no external exam.

The module outcomes this unit works towards:

Learning Objective GAC013.2: Apply the scientific method to plan and conduct scientific investigations.

Learning Objective GAC013.3: Create an investigation report following scientific and academic conventions.

Bahasa Indonesia

Unit 2 dari 5 dalam GAC013 Sains II: Prinsip Sains (Tingkat II). Modul ini diajarkan selama sekitar 40 jam pelajaran ditambah 20 jam belajar mandiri, dan dinilai di pusat pengajaran serta dimoderasi oleh ACT — tidak ada ujian eksternal.

Hasil pembelajaran yang dicapai unit ini:

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.2: Menerapkan metode ilmiah untuk merencanakan dan conducting penyelidikan ilmiah.

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.3: Membuat laporan penyelidikan mengikuti konvensi ilmiah dan akademik.

Source: Cambridge International syllabus · ⁨Sumber: Silabus Cambridge International⁩

English

A hypothesis 假设 is a testable proposed explanation or prediction. Identify what observations would support or challenge it. Research can involve controlled experiments, observation, modelling and revision; it does not always follow one straight sequence.

In a controlled experiment, the independent variable 自变量 is deliberately changed, the dependent variable 因变量 is the measured response, and control variables 控制变量 are kept comparable. A control group 对照组 can provide a comparison without the treatment where the design requires it. Comparing two materials is not automatically a treatment-versus-no-treatment design.

Repeat 重复 trials to examine variation and reduce dependence on one reading. Repeats do not repair a systematically unequal procedure, and a single careful observation is not automatically worthless. Report what the evidence permits and what further checking would help.

Worked example: controlled conditions and a mean

In the fictional written task, fresh squares of two paper types have the same area. Each is immersed for 60 seconds, drained for 10 seconds without squeezing, and weighed using the same checked balance. Retained-water mass is wet mass minus dry mass. Type A records 3.0, 3.2 and 2.8 grams; B records 4.2, 4.0 and 4.4 grams.

The mean summarises the three trials:

$$\bar m=\frac{m_1+m_2+m_3}{3}$$
$$\bar m_A=\frac{3.0+3.2+2.8}{3}=3.0\ \text{g}$$
$$\bar m_B=\frac{4.2+4.0+4.4}{3}=4.2\ \text{g}$$

The difference between means is 1.2 grams. Individual trials vary. Squeezing only A adds another changed condition and undermines a comparison of paper type. Strength, price and other uses were not tested, so “B is always best” is unsupported. Any real practical activity requires the teacher's approved procedure and supervision.

Bahasa Indonesia

Sebuah hipotesis adalah penjelasan atau prediksi yang diusulkan dan dapat diuji. Identifikasi observasi apa yang akan mendukung atau menentangnya. Penelitian dapat melibatkan eksperimen terkendali, observasi, pemodelan, dan revisi; tidak selalu mengikuti satu urutan lurus.

Dalam eksperimen terkendali, variabel bebas diubah secara sengaja, variabel terikat adalah respons yang diukur, dan variabel kontrol dijaga tetap Comparable. Kelompok kontrol dapat menyediakan perbandingan tanpa perlakuan di mana desain membutuhkannya. Membandingkan dua bahan tidak otomatis merupakan desain perlakuan versus tanpa perlakuan.

Ulangi percobaan untuk examining variasi dan mengurangi ketergantungan pada satu pembacaan. Pengulangan tidak memperbaiki prosedur yang tidak setara secara sistematis, dan satu observasi yang hati-hati tidak otomatis tidak berharga. Laporkan apa yang diperbolehkan oleh bukti dan apa lagi yang perlu dicek.

Perbandingan kertas menjaga area dan waktu tetap comparable sebelum mengukur massa basah dikurangi kering.

Contoh terpecahkan: keadaan terkawal dan purata

Dalam tugasan bertulis fiktif, kepingan kertas segar dua jenis mempunyai luas yang sama. Setiapnya direndam selama 60 saat, dikeringkan selama 10 saat tanpa diperah, dan ditimbang menggunakan penimbang seimbang yang sama. Jisim air tertahan ialah jisim basah tolak jisim kering. Jenis A merekodkan 3.0, 3.2 dan 2.8 gram; B merekodkan 4.2, 4.0 dan 4.4 gram.

Purata merumuskan tiga ujian tersebut:

$$\bar m=\frac{m_1+m_2+m_3}{3}$$
$$\bar m_A=\frac{3.0+3.2+2.8}{3}=3.0\ \text{g}$$
$$\bar m_B=\frac{4.2+4.0+4.4}{3}=4.2\ \text{g}$$

Perbezaan antara purata ialah 1.2 gram. Ujian individu berbeza-beza. Memerah hanya A menambah satu lagi keadaan berubah dan melemahkan perbandingan jenis kertas. Kekuatan, harga dan kegunaan lain tidak diuji, jadi “B sentiasa terbaik” tidak disokong. Sebarang aktiviti praktikal sebenar memerlukan prosedur kelulusan guru dan pengawasan.

1.3

The language of science · ⁨Bahasa sains⁩

Syllabus · ⁨Silabus⁩
English

Unit 3 of 5 in GAC013 Science II: Scientific Principles (Level II). The module is taught over about 40 class hours plus 20 hours of independent study, and is assessed at the teaching centre and moderated by ACT — there is no external exam.

The module outcomes this unit works towards:

Learning Objective GAC013.5: Demonstrate knowledge of scientific concepts and terminology from the different areas of science.

Learning Objective GAC013.6: Demonstrate familiarity with and ability to use scientific language, units and notation correctly.

Bahasa Indonesia

Unit 3 dari 5 dalam GAC013 Sains II: Prinsip Sains (Tingkat II). Modul ini diajarkan selama sekitar 40 jam pelajaran ditambah 20 jam belajar mandiri, dan dinilai di pusat pengajaran serta dimoderasi oleh ACT — tidak ada ujian eksternal.

Hasil pembelajaran yang dicapai unit ini:

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.5: Menunjukkan pengetahuan tentang konsep dan terminologi sains dari berbagai bidang sains.

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.6: Menunjukkan kesenangan dan kemampuan menggunakan bahasa sains, satuan, dan notasi dengan benar.

Source: Cambridge International syllabus · ⁨Sumber: Silabus Cambridge International⁩

English

Units 单位 identify the scale of a physical quantity. Some quantities, such as a count or a ratio, are dimensionless but still need a clear definition. A unit conversion changes representation, not the physical quantity. For area, square the length conversion factor.

Accuracy 准确度 concerns closeness to a suitable reference or true value. Precision 精密度 concerns closeness of repeated readings. An instrument can give close repeats with a systematic offset. Significant figures help communicate the supported numerical precision; calculator output is not evidence for extra digits.

Uncertainty 不确定度 describes limitations on a measurement or estimate. Instrument resolution, procedure and variation can contribute. Do not invent an uncertainty range or confidence level that was never established.

Worked example: average speed is not constant speed

For the supplied trolley record, travelled distance is 3.60 metres and elapsed time is 48.0 seconds. Average speed is distance per elapsed time:

$$v_{\text{avg}}=\frac{d}{t}$$
$$v_{\text{avg}}=\frac{3.60\ \text{m}}{48.0\ \text{s}}=0.0750\ \frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}$$

This is an interval average, not a speed at every moment. Separately, timer repeats of 10.1, 10.1 and 10.2 seconds are close, but they disagree with a supplied 12.0-second reference. Investigate the timing procedure instead of claiming accuracy from closeness alone.

Bahasa Indonesia

Unit mengenal pasti skala kuantiti fizikal. Sesetengah kuantiti, seperti bilangan atau nisbah, adalah tak dimensi tetapi masih memerlukan definisi yang jelas. Penukaran unit mengubah perwakilan, bukan kuantiti fizikal itu sendiri. Untuk luas, kuasa duakan faktor penukaran panjang.

Ketepatan berkaitan dengan kedekatan kepada rujukan sesuai atau nilai sebenar. Ketelitian berkaitan dengan kedekatan bacaan berulang. Alat boleh memberikan bacaan berulang yang dekat dengan sesat sistematik. Angka bererti membantu mengkomunikasikan ketelitian numerik yang disokong; keluaran kalkulator bukan bukti untuk digit tambahan.

Ketidakpastian menerangkan had pada ukuran atau anggaran. Resolusi alat, prosedur dan variasi boleh menyumbang. Jangan cipta julat ketidakpastian atau tahap keyakinan yang tidak pernah ditetapkan.

Jarak dan masa yang telah berlalu menentukan kelajuan purata; ketelitian berulang tetap memerlukan semakan ketepatan.

Contoh terpecahkan: kelajuan purata bukanlah kelajuan malar

Untuk rekod troli yang dibekalkan, jarak ditempuh ialah 3.60 meter dan masa yang telah berlalu ialah 48.0 saat. Kelajuan purata ialah jarak bahagi masa yang telah berlalu:

$$v_{\text{avg}}=\frac{d}{t}$$
$$v_{\text{avg}}=\frac{3.60\ \text{m}}{48.0\ \text{s}}=0.0750\ \frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}$$

Ini adalah purata selang, bukan kelajuan pada setiap saat. Secara berasingan, waktu ulang jam 10.1, 10.1 dan 10.2 saat adalah dekat, tetapi mereka tidak bersetuju dengan rujukan 12.0 saat yang dibekalkan. Siasat prosedur pemasaan bukannya mendakwa ketepatan berdasarkan kedekatan semata-mata.

Vocabulary · ⁨Kosa kata⁩ Train · ⁨Latih⁩
English Bahasa Indonesia
Units/ˈjuːnɪts/ Unit
Accuracy/ˈækjʊrəsi/ Akurasi
precision/prɪˈsɪʒn/ presisi
Uncertainty/ʌnˈsɜːtənti/ Ketidakpastian
Peer review/pɪə rɪˈvjuː/ Peninjauan sejawat
Replication/ˌreplɪˈkeɪʃn/ Replikasi
institutions/ˌɪnstɪˈtjuːʃnz/ institusi
Risk/rɪsk/ Risiko
Communicating uncertainty/kəˈmjuːnɪkeɪtɪŋ ʌnˈsɜːtənti/ Mengkomunikasikan ketidakpastian
1.4

The organization of science · ⁨Organisasi sains⁩

Syllabus · ⁨Silabus⁩
English

Unit 4 of 5 in GAC013 Science II: Scientific Principles (Level II). The module is taught over about 40 class hours plus 20 hours of independent study, and is assessed at the teaching centre and moderated by ACT — there is no external exam.

The module outcomes this unit works towards:

Learning Objective GAC013.1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the historical development of scientific ideas, and apply that knowledge to differentiate between the different areas of science.

Learning Objective GAC013.5: Demonstrate knowledge of scientific concepts and terminology from the different areas of science.

Bahasa Indonesia

Unit 4 dari 5 dalam GAC013 Sains II: Prinsip Sains (Tingkat II). Modul ini diajarkan selama sekitar 40 jam pelajaran ditambah 20 jam belajar mandiri, dan dinilai di pusat pengajaran serta dimoderasi oleh ACT — tidak ada ujian eksternal.

Hasil pembelajaran yang dicapai unit ini:

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.1: Menunjukkan pengetahuan dan pemahaman tentang perkembangan historis ide-ide ilmiah, dan menerapkan pengetahuan tersebut untuk membedakan antara bidang-bidang sains yang berbeda.

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.5: Menunjukkan pengetahuan tentang konsep dan terminologi sains dari berbagai bidang sains.

Source: Cambridge International syllabus · ⁨Sumber: Silabus Cambridge International⁩

English

Peer review 同行评审 asks relevant specialists to examine a study's methods and reasoning. It can identify weaknesses, but is not automatic product certification. Replication 可重复性 obtains new observations using an appropriately comparable procedure to investigate a finding. Checking calculations on the same readings is useful, but does not supply a new independent experiment.

Research institutions 机构 provide people, resources and rules. Disclose funding and relevant interests. Examine whether they affect design, analysis or reporting; funding alone proves neither honesty nor dishonesty. Transparent records and independent scrutiny help readers judge a claim.

Worked example: a review finds a condition that matters

A fictional insulating-sleeve report compares cups starting at different temperatures. A reviewer flags that difference. A second calculation cannot remove the unequal starting condition. A second school's independent experiment could improve checking, but it supplies no confirmation until performed. Keep the original record and explain its limit rather than inventing a successful replication.

Bahasa Indonesia

Semakan rakan sejawat meminta pakar relevan meneliti kaedah dan alasan sebuah kajian. Ia boleh mengenal pasti kelemahan, tetapi bukan pensijilan produk automatik. Pengulangan memperoleh pemerhatian baharu menggunakan prosedur yang boleh dibandingkan dengan sesuai untuk menyelidik temuan. Memeriksa pengiraan pada bacaan yang sama berguna, tetapi tidak menyediakan eksperimen bebas baharu.

Lembaga penyelidikan menyediakan orang, sumber dan peraturan. Nyatakan pembiayaan dan kepentingan yang relevan. Semak apakah ia mempengaruhi reka bentuk, analisis atau pelaporan; pembiayaan semata-mata membuktikan neither kejujuran juga kemungkiran. Rekod telus dan pemeriksaan bebas membantu pembaca menilai suatu tujahan.

Kajian asal, semakan pakar dan ujian bebas yang dirancang mempunyai peranan bukti yang berbeza.

Contoh terpecahkan: semakan mendapati suatu keadaan yang penting

Laporan sleeve penebat fiktif membandingkan cawan bermula pada suhu yang berbeza. Seorang peninjau memberi amaran tentang perbezaan itu. Pengiraan kedua tidak dapat menghapuskan keadaan permulaan yang tidak sama. Eksperimen bebas sekolah kedua boleh meningkatkan pemeriksaan, tetapi ia tidak menyediakan pengesahan sehingga dilaksanakan. Simpan rekod asal dan jelaskan hadnya bukannya mencipta pengulangan berjaya.

1.5

Scientific issues · ⁨Isu saintifik⁩

Syllabus · ⁨Silabus⁩
English

Unit 5 of 5 in GAC013 Science II: Scientific Principles (Level II). The module is taught over about 40 class hours plus 20 hours of independent study, and is assessed at the teaching centre and moderated by ACT — there is no external exam.

The module outcomes this unit works towards:

Learning Objective GAC013.4: Discuss the contribution of scientific advances.

Bahasa Indonesia

Unit 5 dari 5 dalam GAC013 Sains II: Prinsip Sains (Tingkat II). Modul ini diajarkan selama sekitar 40 jam pelajaran ditambah 20 jam belajar mandiri, dan dinilai di pusat pengajaran serta dimoderasi oleh ACT — tidak ada ujian eksternal.

Hasil pembelajaran yang dicapai unit ini:

Tujuan Pembelajaran GAC013.4: Membahas kontribusi kemajuan ilmiah.

Source: Cambridge International syllabus · ⁨Sumber: Silabus Cambridge International⁩

English

Scientific work can inform decisions about technologies and their effects. Evidence does not by itself decide every value, cost or acceptable trade-off. A risk 风险 concerns both the chance and seriousness of harm; a possible harm is not automatically frequent, and uncertainty is not proof of zero risk.

Communicating uncertainty 传达不确定性 means describing the assumptions, scope and unknowns accurately. Use an established range where available, but do not invent one because a single number looks insufficient. A bounded estimate can still be useful.

Worked example: an energy benefit is one decision input

Assume a lamp operates 5 hours daily for 20 days: 100 hours. Compare constant powers of 60 watts and 10 watts. Convert to kilowatts because the requested energy unit is kilowatt-hours:

$$E=Pt$$
$$E_{old}=0.060\ \text{kW}\times100\ \text{h}=6.0\ \text{kWh}$$
$$E_{new}=0.010\ \text{kW}\times100\ \text{h}=1.0\ \text{kWh}$$

The estimated reduction is 5.0 kilowatt-hours under those assumptions. No tariff establishes a monetary saving, and no lighting measurement establishes equal brightness. Check required performance, purchase and installation costs, compatibility and reliability. Replacement needs school approval and authorised personnel. Students should analyse the supplied data, not carry out electrical installation.

Bahasa Indonesia

Kerja saintifik boleh memberi maklumat mengenai keputusan tentang teknologi dan kesannya. Bukti sendiri tidak memutuskan setiap nilai, kos atau pertukaran yang boleh diterima. Risiko berkaitan dengan peluang dan keseriusan bahaya; kemungkinan bahaya tidak secara automatik kerap, dan ketidakpastian bukan bukti risiko sifar.

Mengomunikasikan ketidakpastian bermaksud menerangkan asumsi, skop dan perkara yang tidak diketahui dengan tepat. Gunakan julat yang mapan jika ada, tetapi jangan cipta satu kerana nombor tunggal kelihatan tidak mencukupi. Anggaran terhad masih boleh berguna.

Anggaran kuasa dan masa memberi maklumat perbandingan lampu sebelum keputusan kesesuaian dan kelulusan.

Contoh terpecahkan: faedah tenaga adalah satu input keputusan

Anggapkan sebuah lampu beroperasi 5 jam sehari selama 20 hari: 100 jam. Bandingkan kuasa malar 60 watt dan 10 watt. Tukarkan kepada kilowatt kerana unit tenaga diminta ialah kilowatt-jam:

$$E=Pt$$
$$E_{old}=0.060\ \text{kW}\times100\ \text{h}=6.0\ \text{kWh}$$
$$E_{new}=0.010\ \text{kW}\times100\ \text{h}=1.0\ \text{kWh}$$

Pengurangan anggaran ialah 5.0 kilowatt-jam di bawah assumption itu. Tiada tarif menetapkan penjimatan wang, dan tiada pengukuran pencahayaan menetapkan kecerahan yang sama. Semak prestasi yang diperlukan, kos pembelian dan pemasangan, kompatibiliti dan kebolehpercayaan. Penggantian memerlukan kelulusan sekolah dan kakitangan yang dibenarkan. Murid harus menganalisis data yang dibekalkan, bukan melakukan pemasangan elektrik.

Additional notes PDF

From readings to an investigation report

A paper holds more water in one comparison. What should its report actually claim? A strong report lets the reader trace the conclusion back to the method and readings. These extra notes develop the reporting outcome alongside the original GAC013 handout. Your teacher's actual brief sets the required structure and assessment criteria.

Plan, conduct and record

A research question 研究问题 identifies what you want to find out. For example: which of two paper types retains more water under the stated procedure? A hypothesis 假设 gives a testable prediction or explanation. Predict a difference between paper types, then identify which readings could challenge that prediction.

Specify the independent variable 自变量, measured response and relevant controlled conditions before starting. Here, paper type is the independent variable. Retained-water mass, measured as wet mass minus dry mass, is the dependent variable 因变量. Use fresh squares with the same area, the same immersion and draining times, and the same checked balance. Do not squeeze only one paper type. State how the order of trials will be chosen. A change in procedure must be recorded; it cannot be repaired by hiding a reading.

Obtain teacher agreement on a safe, permitted method before conducting any practical activity. Keep a dated record of materials, instructions, units, readings and changes to the plan. Record what happened, including unexpected observations and missing readings. Do not invent completed trials.

Show the evidence and the calculation

The following table repeats the original handout's fictional data. It is written practice, not a new completed investigation.

Trial A retained-water mass / g B retained-water mass / g
1 3.0 4.2
2 3.2 4.0
3 2.8 4.4
Mean 平均值 3.0 4.2

A mean summarises the readings. Show enough calculation for a reader to check it:

$$\bar m_A=\frac{3.0+3.2+2.8}{3}=3.0\ \text{g}$$
$$\bar m_B=\frac{4.2+4.0+4.4}{3}=4.2\ \text{g}$$

The difference between these means is $4.2-3.0=1.2\ \text{g}$. Each paper's readings span 0.4 grams. This spread is not automatically the full measurement uncertainty 测量不确定度. The balance, timing and draining procedure may also contribute to uncertainty. No statistical test 统计检验 or confidence level 置信水平 has been supplied; do not invent one.

Write a conclusion that fits the test

A conclusion 结论 answers the research question using the recorded evidence. For these fictional readings, B retained more water on average under the supplied conditions. The observed difference is 1.2 grams. Both types show variation between trials.

Do not write “B is best for every task”. Strength, price and performance in other uses were not tested. Do not claim that repeats repaired an unequal procedure. Repeats help examine variation, not remove systematic bias 系统性偏差. A limitation should identify a specific problem and explain its effect on the interpretation. An improvement should address that problem, not promise perfect results.

Worked evaluation. One trial used a longer draining time for A. Its reading may be lower because of the changed draining procedure, rather than paper type alone. Keep the original record and flag the departure from the plan. A later permitted trial using the agreed timing can add evidence; it does not make the earlier event disappear.

Organise and reference the report

Report part What the reader needs
Question and background The question, prediction and relevant scientific ideas
Method Materials, variables, procedure, safety and reasons for key choices
Results Actual observations, units, tables and checked calculations
Discussion and conclusion The answer, alternative explanations, limits and justified improvements
References and supporting material Sources of background claims and the records needed to check the work

A reference 参考文献 identifies where a borrowed fact, idea or image came from. Use the reference style required by your brief. Keep enough information to locate each source. Mark supplied case data as supplied data. Distinguish research you propose from work actually completed. Copying a claim from a website is not independent confirmation of it. Check who produced the source, which evidence it provides and whether it addresses your question.

Practice and explained answers

  1. Identify the changed variable and measured response.
  2. Why do three repeats not repair squeezing only A?
  3. Calculate the mean difference and each set's range.
  4. Write a conclusion without a universal product claim.
  5. How should a report describe a test that is only planned?

Answers.

  1. Change paper type; measure wet mass minus dry mass, in grams.
  2. Squeezing changes another condition. Repeats do not isolate paper type.
  3. Mean difference: 1.2 g. Each range: 0.4 g, not the whole uncertainty.
  4. B retained more water under these conditions; other properties were not tested.
  5. Label it as planned; it adds no observations or confirmation until performed.

Interactive lessons on this topic · ⁨Pelajaran interaktif untuk topik ini⁩

Work through it step by step, with instant-check exercises. · ⁨Kerjakan langkah demi langkah, dengan latihan pengecekan instan.⁩

Log in or create account · ⁨Masuk atau buat akun⁩

IGCSE, A-Level & AP